An empire of petrochemical corporations is expanding to feed an endless appetite for plastic products. Where petrochemical plants take root, severe ecological harm often befalls nearby (usually low-income and/or BIPOC) communities, spelling disaster for their health and livelihoods. As petrochemical conglomerates seamlessly traverse international borders, the damage they inflict manifests on a global scale.
Formosa Plastics Group (FPG), one of the world’s largest petrochemical corporations, is a hallmark of irresponsible industry. Originating from Taiwan, FPG has an egregious reputation for pollution, illegal waste dumping, and workplace accidents. Constant incidents of environmental harm and safety infractions have provoked opposition movements from communities in Louisiana, Texas, Taiwan, and Vietnam. FPG’s sprawling presence across the globe proves a unique challenge to activists tackling the corporation. Can environmental justice organizers negotiate borders as easily as the petrochemical corporations they seek to stop?
My thesis research will explore transnational environmental justice theory and practice as they apply to activists in Taiwan and the United States opposing FPG. Through in-depth interviews, archival research, and some participant-observation, I will investigate the current relationship between domestic and overseas organizers. Through this study, I want to explore: 1) how advocates opposing FPG understand overseas advocates in relation to themselves, 2) what efforts to communicate or collaborate with overseas communities exist, and 3) what logistical or cultural barriers may limit the formation of international activist alliances. From this study, we can better understand how to hold petrochemical corporations to a global standard of environmental equity by sharing knowledge and tactics across organizations.